|
|
|
|
Bookstore Law Workbook, The: Developing Skills for Legal Research and Writing
FREE INSTRUCTOR’S GUIDE
Content Summary
TopPrefaceThis workbook provides exercises that show students how to read, research, and analyze problems like a lawyer. The exercises focus the student’s attention on the skills used to discern relevant information, to identify legal questions, to research effectively, and to resolve legal problems. TopTable of ContentsPreface Chapter 1 Analytical skills: How to analyze problems and identify legal issues Identify the relevant facts Exercise 1 Mr. Jones and Ms Smith Exercise 2 Ms Ravji and the Ashtar Estate Exercise 3 Green Acres Exercise 4 Romeo and Juliet Assess the significance of the facts Exercise 5 Remedial facts Identify the relevant legal issues categorize the area of law Exercise 6 Higgs v. City School Exercise 7 Mr. Kuresh Exercise 8 Mr. Fuentes and Steel & Wheels Inc. Exercise 9 Rucz family References Chapter 2 Research skills: How to find the applicable laws Introduction: How to research a legal problem The research checklist subject headings Exercise 1 Exercise 2 Exercise 3 Exercise 4 Exercise 5 Exercise 6 Exercise 7 Exercise 8 Exercise 9 Exercise 10 Exercise 11 Exercise 12 Exercise 13 Exercise 14 Exercise 15 References Chapter 3 Online research skills: How to search legal databases Introduction Searching strategies for the Internet Practise writing Boolean query searches Practise using Boolean query searches Chapter 4 Case-briefing skills: How to read a court case like a lawyer Introduction Questions used to brief a case Demonstration Case-briefing skills: Rowe v. Canning Method 1: Using a chart summary Exercise 1 Allied Plastering & Stucco Ltd. v. A. Visca Architect Inc. Exercise 2 Nguyen v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Method 2: Preparing a written summary Exercise 3 Toronto (City) v. Ontario Exercise 4 Smart v. Law Society: A matter of professional ethics Method 3: Underlining and margin notes Exercise 4 Tutton et al. v. Corporation of the Town of Pickering et al. Exercise 5 Peinet Inc. v. O’Brien Exercise 6 Prepare a case brief for Peinet Inc. v. O’Brien Cases Chapter 5 Skills of legal analysis: How to use the law to solve problems and predict outcomes Introduction Demonstration: Legal analysis skills Demonstration: Predictive writing skills Practising the tools of legal analysis: Analogy, distinction, synthesis, and reconciliation Exercise A1 Identify the key words, facts, and legal concepts raised by the problem Exercise A2 Is the case analogous to the problem at hand? Exercise A3 Is the case distinguishable from the problem at hand? Exercise A4 Applying the law: Using analogous cases Exercise A5 Applying the law: Using distinguishable cases Exercise A6 Reconcile the differences in the case law Exercise A7 Based on the case law, synthesize the applicable law Exercise B1 Identify the key words, facts, and legal concepts raised by the problem Exercise B2 Brief the relevant case law Exercise B3 Synthesize the applicable law Exercise B4 Identify binding authorities Exercise B5 Analyze analogous and distinguishable cases Exercise B6 Reconcile the apparent discrepancies in the case law Exercise B7 Scenario A: Legal analysis indicates that a favourable decision is likely Exercise B8 Scenario B: Legal analysis indicates that a favourable decision is not likely Exercise C1 Identify the key words, facts, and legal concepts raised by the problem Exercise C2 Brief the relevant case law Exercise C3 Synthesize the applicable law Exercise C4 Identify binding authorities Exercise C5 Analyze analogous and distinguishable cases Exercise C6 Reconcile the apparent discrepancies in the case law Exercise C7 Scenario A: Legal analysis indicates that a favourable decision is likely Exercise C8 Scenario B: Legal analysis indicates that a favourable decision is not likely Exercise D1 Identify the key words, facts, and legal concepts raised by the problem Exercise D2 Brief the relevant case law Exercise D3 Synthesize the applicable law Exercise D4 Analyze analogous and distinguishable cases Exercise D5 Scenario A: Kitty Hawk’s case Exercise D6 Scenario B: Holly Berry’s case Exercise D7 Scenario C: Marc Curvesco’s case Exercise E1 Identify the key words, facts, and legal concepts raised by the problem Exercise E1 Brief the relevant case law Exercise E2 Synthesize the applicable law Exercise E3 Analyze analogous and distinguishable cases Exercise E4 Scenario A: Charles Shingoose’s case References Appendix Choosing databases on Quicklaw, Westlaw, and Lexis |